您可以在百度里搜索“元认知策略研究：二语听力理解与附带词汇习得（英文版） 艾草文学(www.321553.xyz)”查找最新章节！

　　5.4.1 Correlations between Listening Comprehension (LC) and Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition (IVA) for Cycle 1

　　To investigate the relationship between the learners' listening comprehension and incidental vocabulary acquisition for Cycle 1, their listening comprehension scores and their vocabulary acquisition scores were correlated, and the results are reported in Table 49.

　　Table 49 Correlations between LC and IVA for Cycle 1

　　Note. Group A=listening one time; Group B=listening three times; Group D=inferencing training+listening three times; PE=Planning-Evaluation; PS=Problem-Solving; Imm=immediate post-tests; Del=delayed post-tests; *p＜.05; **p＜.01; a=cannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant.

　　For the whole sample, significant correlations were found between listening comprehension and all six vocabulary sub-tests. For the immediate form test (r=.214), delayed reception test (r=.202) and both immediate and delayed production tests (r=.238; r=.236), the correlations were statistically significant at the 0.01 level, with a 99% degree of confidence. For the delayed form test (r=.191) and immediate reception test (r=.192), the correlations were statistically significant at the 0.05 level, with a 95% degree of confidence.

　　For Group A, listening comprehension was significantly correlated with the delayed production test (r=.439). For Group B, listening comprehension was significantly correlated with the immediate form test (r=.405). The correlations were statistically significant at the 0.01 level, with a 99% degree of confidence. For Group D, listening comprehension was significantly correlated with the delayed reception test (r=.381). The correlation was statistically significant at the 0.05 level, with a 95% degree of confidence. 元认知策略研究：二语听力理解与附带词汇习得（英文版）